• Naturopathy
    • Workplace Wellness
  • Mentoring
    • Learn
    • Practitioner retreat
  • About
    • About Gill
    • Naturopathy FAQ
    • Media
    • Speaking
  • Articles
  • Newsletter
  • Recipes & Resources
    • Food
    • Books
    • Vodcasts & more
  • Contact
facebook
rss
twitter

Articles

07
NOV
2011

Are multivitamins killing you?

Tags : Archives of Internal Medicine, calcium, copper, HRT, Iowa Women's Health Study, multivitamins, Mursu, premarin, vioxx, Vitamin C, vitamin E, vitamins, women's health
Posted By : Gill Stannard
Comments : 1

If you’ve been following the news lately you could believe vitamin and mineral supplements are either a waste of money or worse. According to reports of one study, they’ll even shorten your life.

Popping vitamins may do more harm than good, according to a new study that adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting some supplements may have health risks…Women who took supplements had, on average, a 2.4 percent increased risk of dying over the course of the 19-year study, compared with women who didn’t take supplements”. Yahoo news

But was that the actual conclusion the researchers made? Hands up the shock jocks, journalists or even medical reporters who have read the original research? I’ve spent the past few weeks reviewing the paper and discussing it with scientists to get to grips with the statistical world of “hazard ratios” and the drawing of such devastating conclusions.

Almost 39,000 older women (average age 62 years old) initially took part in a longitudinal study but at its completion 19 years later less than 17,000 remained. As would be expected from this demographic, some had died but a number had dropped out or were excluded for other reasons.

The group was not double blind. This means there were no placebos. Everyone involved took their own self selected supplements. This is very unusual in an era of research where the double blind study is considered to be the “gold standard” in medical research.

The participants self-reported the supplements they took when surveyed in 1986, 1997 and 2004. The survey did not include how consistently they took the supplements. For example whether it was an impulse buy of a single bottle or had they taken the supplements every day for 19 years?

The dosage of each vitamin or mineral was also not included. Women took different brands and combinations. Keep in mind that the United States does not have stringent therapeutic goods laws or the same codes of good manufacturing practice as we have in Australia. The majority of supplement products on the shelves in that country would not be able to be sold here.

The two nutrients associated with the greatest negative impact on life expectancy were copper and iron. Excess iron intake has known risks. None of the women were screened for haemochromatosis, a common metabolic condition that causes the body to deposit iron in vital organs, which if not controlled can be fatal. Copper is an unusual single supplement to take. In 20 years of practice I have never prescribed it. In fact very few of the women in the study took a copper supplement. In 1986 there were only 30, which is less than 0.01 percent of participants. Not the “40,000” women some media source alluded to. Most scientists would consider this too small a sample to draw any conclusions.

The supplement that hit the headlines was the multivitamin. The researchers concluded that taking a multivitamin was associated with a 2.4 percent increased mortality (death) risk. What these vitamins consisted of and how long and consistently they were taken was not included in the study. It certainly includes a wide variety of possibilities. While some screening of existing health conditions was used in the study, the authors admit that they didn’t “exclude the possibility that some supplements were taken for reasonable cause in response to symptoms or clinical disease”. In other words some participants may have had unreported pre-existing deficiencies or diseases that may have been related to increased death rates.

The scientists I consulted said the study was too poorly designed to jump to the conclusion that multivitamins “can kill you”, as many media outlets reported.

The paper also does not mention any prescribed medication the women were taking during the study. While the research has been criticized for not ruling our many major health issues, there is no mention of arthritis or menopause-related medications being included. The anti-inflammatory drug Vioxx was withdrawn from the market in 2004 and is considered to have caused around 60,000 deaths. Premarin, a form of Hormone Replacement Therapy associated with increasing the risk of breast cancer, was in common use during much of the survey period. As women aged 55 year and older were a target market for these drugs, it raises more issues about the study.

Selective reporting in the media

Although it appears that almost all journalists ignored the flaws in the research, their reports focused on particular findings. Most concentrated on the negative outcomes, ignoring or underplaying the many positive results.

The study concluded that many of the women taking certain supplements lived longer. In particular taking a B vitamin complex, C, D, E and calcium were positively associated with decreased mortality.

“In agreement with our hypothesis, most of the supplements studied were not associated with a reduced total mortality rate in older women.” ”Mursu et al, Dietary Supplements and Mortality Rate in Older Women: The Iowa Women’s Health Study

Do you still think that your vitamins are killing you?

It all depends on what studies you read, or what media you listen to. As a regular multivitamin user of over twenty years, the Iowa Women’s Health Study has not changed my supplementing habits. For me the jury is out until a better designed study can reproduce their results.

Whether you need the vitamins your take, or are taking the best product for your requirements is another question entirely. The majority of clients whose supplements I review are taking more than they need or are under-dosing on the nutrients their specific condition requires.

Further reading

For a free pdf of the study, click “study” in the first paragraph in Junk Science.

A good, plain English analysis of the study in the Huffington Post.

An older analysis of vitamin research suggests How to Fake a Vitamin Study.

Similar Posts:

  • Health Q & A – are mushrooms a good source of Vitamin D?
  • Health Q & A Monday – strong bones
  • Behind the headline: can Vitamin D prevent depression?
  • The good oil on depression
  • diet and cancer risks

About the Author
Gill Stannard is one of Australia's most experienced naturopaths and mentors, now in her third decade of service to the healing profession. You can work with Gill in person in Sydney (and every couple of months in Melbourne), or from anywhere in the world via Skype. What's stopping you from living a healthier and happier life? Contact coaching@gillstannard.com.au for more details, or book you consultation at http://bookeo.com/gillstannard Gill has written hundreds of articles on this site, just use the search box to find more . Like my facebook page https://www.facebook.com/citynaturaltherapies

Social Share

One Comment

  1. Pingback: In this month’s newsletter — Gill Stannard

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

*
*

captcha *

Receive Gill’s Newsletter FREE

Work With Gill

Gill Stannard Work With Gill

Recent Posts

November clinic update

November 25, 2019

Book review: Create a Fertile Life

November 11, 2019
street library orange painted wood around a glass window with read a book you've got time

Simple pleasures: living

November 09, 2019

Recipe: green herb sauce

November 01, 2019

Archives

  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • Friends don’t let friend’s drink water with ‘just a drop’ of essential oil. Really. This is strong medicine, often… https://t.co/X5NKTQlKiR 2 days ago
  • @Dunc21157848 @netregistry After you denying my website issues were not your fault I’ve spent $$ with my website gu… https://t.co/XPaOTz2BY5 5 days ago
  • “This year 90 volunteers have delivered 26 Survivors Teaching Students presentations across Australia and reached j… https://t.co/TQ6oJI8JRd 7 days ago
  • @netregistry no updates for 2 days. What’s happening with the cpanel problem? 8 days ago
  • https://t.co/SzIqTlcxJ1 help urgently needed. According to Netregistry my white screen of death when I try to log i… https://t.co/PqK0q71Cgz 8 days ago
facebook Facebook
twitter Twitter
rss Feed Reader
© 2019 Gill Stannard Naturopath | Mentor